Posterous
Ryan is using Posterous to post everything online. Shouldn't you?
Anglosaxonhelmet_thumb
 

Thoughts and ramblings

Might as well be honest

This is our scavenger hunt

                                       

We are doing a scavenger hunt in the dark, but cameras aren't doing so well. So the iPhone it is.

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted December 5, 2009
// 0 Comments

This is why travelling on the 401 can be a pain.

via tweetie

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted December 5, 2009
// 0 Comments

Book Review: Darwin's Black Box

Disclaimer:  If you don't like the idea of me getting a little annoyed and, perhaps, somewhat, hostile to those who characterise me as an idiot because I don't believe as they do, please do not read on.  That little prejudice of mine comes out in this post.  You may not like it.  Consider yourself warned.

 

Michael Behe is a professor of Bio-Chemistry at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania.  His book, Darwin's Black Box, is rejected by almost all of the evolutionary science community.  Now, I am not a scientist, but the book is an excellent introduction to the field of intelligent design, especially because Behe introduces the concept of irreducible complexity.  While no experiment has been able to disprove this idea, it has been dismissed by many scientists as being a religious idea.  In fact, Behe has become something of a pariah in the evolutionary science community.  Then again, his findings seem to be a real problem for the theory of evolution as far as macro-evolution or molecules-to-man evolution is concerned.  

However, this is a book review, not a science debate.  I think Behe can hold his own if people will listen to what he has to say and not dismiss it out of hand because it does not fit their particular world view.  As a book, Darwin's Black Box is well written and accessible, even to the Discovery Channel level scientist.  I do not, by the way, mean the scientists on the Discovery Channel, but those whose scientific education has extended no further.  That being said, it is not lacking in scientific information.  There are sections that deal in a very complex way with the molecular machinery that is the study of bio-chemistry.  Behe puts forward a rather convincing argument based on a study of the molecular machines that are his field of study.  His discussion of the irreducible complexity of the eye, for example, is detailed and backed up by an obvious knowledge of the way in which the eye works in its various forms.  

The only problem that Behe's book faces is the problem of perception.  As a result of his questioning evolutionary theory, not evolutionary law, and the ramifications of this questioning, the book is dismissed.  It has not been refuted, simply rejected.  This is important.  To confirm which university Behe teaches at, I checked Wikipedia.  The article on Behe is more concerned with dismissing his ideas than giving any information.  However, even the quotations from leading opponents do not actually deal with the science.  If I may quote Richard Dawkins, "He's a straightforward creationist. What he has done is to take a standard argument which dates back to the 19th century, the argument of irreducible complexity, the argument that there are certain organs, certain systems in which all the bits have to be there together or the whole system won't work...like the eye. Darwin answered (this)…point by point, piece by piece. But maybe he shouldn't have bothered. Maybe what he should have said is…maybe you're too thick to think of a reason why the eye could have come about by gradual steps, but perhaps you should go away and think a bit harder." Hmm.  No real science there, but definitely a real hostility.  While Wikipedia states that his work has been debunked (a choice of term that reveals authorial bias), there are only general statements and Behe's own responses are given no real credence.  

My advice is this, which is the same that I would give to anyone.  Consider it all for yourself.  Behe's book is not for someone who does not want to look at science too closely, nor is it an attempt to court the public by using assumptions.  Behe breaks it all down, piece by piece and protein by protein.  Overall, it's an excellent read.  

I would apologise for my somewhat combative tone, but I grow tired of people (on any side of this or any other argument) who dismiss an opposing viewpoint as stupid without any consideration of the issues at hand.  While this view is not popular, it is probably important to note that the athiests cannot legitimately dismiss intelligent design out of hand simply because it is believed by theists.  Then, it would only be valid to dismiss naturalistic evolution out of hand because it is believed by atheists.  Somehow, I doubt that little idea is not popular.  
Feel free to dismiss me in the comments section.  

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted December 1, 2009
// 0 Comments

Seriously? I mean there are intuitive controls, but this is ridiculous.

via tweetie

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted November 27, 2009
// 0 Comments

The fog is a bit spooky.

via tweetie

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted November 24, 2009
// 0 Comments

Mama said there'd be days like this.

Sunset is an angel weeping
Holding out a bloody sword
No matter how I squint I cannot
Make out what it's pointing toward
Sometimes you feel like you live too long
Days drip slowly on the page
You catch yourself
Pacing the cage

I've proven who I am so many times
The magnetic strip's worn thin
And each time I was someone else
And every one was taken in
Hours chatter in high places
Stir up eddies in the dust of rage
Set me to pacing the cage

I never knew what you all wanted
So I gave you everything
All that I could pillage
All the spells that I could sing
It's as if the thing were written
In the constitution of the age
Sooner or later you'll wind up
Pacing the cage

Sometimes the best map will not guide you
You can't see what's round the bend
Sometimes the road leads through dark places
Sometimes the darkness is your friend
Today these eyes scan bleached-out land
For the coming of the outbound stage.
Pacing the cage.
Pacing the cage.

(Pacing the Cage by Bruce Cockburn)


There are just days like this. I've been told I have a melancholic disposition. I would agree. These lyrics just fit for these days. They express it perfectly. There are times when we are just world weary.

Enough said, I think.

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted November 23, 2009
// 0 Comments

Thinking about remembrance

Why do we remember? What is it about any particular event, person or thing that makes us want to remember it? I do not mean to remember something in the passive sense, such as hoping that we remember to stop at the store on the way home. I mean the active form of commemoration that causes us to bring to mind something in particular.

This week, we remembered those who gave and are giving their lives as soldiers. We remember the magnitude of the sacrifice at 11:00 am on November 11 every year. We remember, as the saying goes, lest we forget. That seems to me to be the point. So few of us spare a thought to those who routinely lay their lives on the line for their country throughout the rest of the year. Those men and women are forgotten by the majority of people for the majority of the time between November 12 and November 10. Perhaps, when a story comes up on the news, we look up for a moment and think that it is a terrible thing for a moment and then forget about it. We commemorate this day because it forces us to remember the past. The saying goes that those who forget the past are doomed to repeat its mistakes. This is true. After all, we are continually repeating those mistakes. Wars are still being fought.

Now, I am not saying that we should simply refuse to fight. War is a bad thing, but occasionally it is necessary. We often forget that. Those of us who have never had to fight for freedom have a tendency, I think, to take it and those who offer their lives up for it, for granted. In fact, we devalue them often because we have felt no risk. We are the privileged and, thus, live without that understanding.

Once a year, we remember. We wear a poppy and remember those who gave their lives fighting for their nation and their nation's cause. We make ourselves remember because we know we are prone to forget. Lest we forget.

This post has taken me a long time to write. I must say that I am not sure if it what I want it to be, but it's been too long now. The moment, I think, may have passed.

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted November 18, 2009
// 0 Comments

Our anniversary day out

                     

So we're having a day out for our anniversary. Enjoy the pics from our wanderings. Sadly, we never caught the Ferrari for a better picture. We simply rambled for the day, so we could enjoy being together. It was a delight. We finished the evening with dinner at a local Italian restaurant named Ferro. It was a great meal and the manager gave us dessert on the house as a congratulations. The last picture is one taken outside The Rushton, another great local restaurant. Their Christmas tree was just so cool. It's hard to believe that 11 years have passed already. Truth be told, it feels like hardly any time has passed at all. We spoke tonight of the changes in us over the years and how we have only become closer through it all. I'll admit that I tend to brag a little (OK, a lot) about my wife and our relationship, but I really am telling the truth. I am, for the record, the most happily married person I know. These years have been great, but we're just getting started. There's so much cool stuff (and probably tough times too) ahead, but it's going to be great. I am truly blessed.

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted November 14, 2009
// 0 Comments

This is the lobby of the Sheraton in Hamilton where we stayed after the concert.

via tweetie

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted November 14, 2009
// 0 Comments

This is the stage where Bruce Cockburn played.

via tweetie
The show was so amazing. Bruce Cockburn is an extremely talented musician. More than that, he has the ability to connect with his audience that makes the show very personal. He began with 'Lovers in a Dangerous Time' and played for well over 2 1/2 hours. His playing was magnificent and his voice sounded great. He would chat with the audience throughout, joking with those who were making comments and requests. Indeed, it was like he really enjoyed having the audience so vocally involved. He played three encores, ending the show with 'Last Night of the World' and 'Mystery.' When he played 'Wondering Where the Lions Are,' the audience sang along enthusiastically, with his prompting of course. Bruce Cockburn's music is real in a way that so much else is not. His songs are so personal, yet they speak to the hearer like his own thoughts would. He played a song he wrote only a month ago after coming home from Afghanistan and being part of a ramp ceremony there. It was so powerful, especially this close to Remembrance Day. I would go see Bruce Cockburn in concert again in a heartbeat. My only disappointment was that he did not play 'Pacing the Cage,' for it is my favourite song of his and one of my favourites overall. This is but a small thing, I know. Truly, a profound and memorable night. Few concerts I have seen will ever match match it.

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted November 13, 2009
// 0 Comments